The Secure Internet of Things Research Program held its annual research retreat on June 6-7, 2018. The one-and-a-half day event was at the Dream Inn on the Santa Cruz beach and boardwalk. The first day consisted of a poster session and evening dinner. The second day consisted of detailed research talks, a debate, and discussion between faculty, students, industrial affiliates, and guests on securing the Internet of Things.
The retreat focused on research results from the past year, presented by Ph.D. students, as well as discussion and debate on emerging security and privacy concerns. Much to the surprise of those attending, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs won the debate against Keith Winstein, convincing the audience that privacy research was unlikely to have impact in the face of financial and business pressures.
Wednesday, June 6th | ||
5:00-6:00 | Welcome and reception, Surf View Room | |
6:00-6:30 | Poster lightning talk session | |
6:30-10:00 | Poster session, dinner | |
Thursday, June 7th | ||
8:00-9:00 | Breakfast | |
9:00-9:10 | Welcome and state of the IoT, Steve Eglash | |
9:10-9:30 | Research overview, Philip Levis | |
9:30-10:00 | Closing the Loop on Secure Operating System Design, Amit Levy | |
10:00-10:30 | Design Considerations for Low-Power Internet Protocols, Hudson Ayers | |
10:30-11:00 | Break | |
11:00-11:30 | Pantheon: the training ground for Internet congestion-control research, Francis Y. Yan | |
11:30-12:00 | Capacity over Capacitance: Exploiting Batteries for a More Reliable Internet of Things, Neal Jackson | |
12:00-1:00 | Lunch | |
1:00-2:00 | Debate, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs and Keith Winstein. "Tech transfer of privacy research is doomed to fail." | |
2:00-2:30 | ||
2:30-3:00 | Salsify: Better videoconferencing by rethinking the interface between the video codec and transport protocol, Sadjad Fouladi | |
3:00-3:30 | Break | |
3:30-4:00 | T/Key: Second-Factor Authentication From Secure Hash Chains, Dima Kogan | |
4:00-4:30 | Secure and Safe Smart Machining, Dawson Engler | |
4:30-5:30 | Closing (Steve and Phil), feedback and discussion |